On Thursday, an appeals court upheld Texas' ability to enforce a law that restricts certain performances involving sexual prosthetics. The law, S.B. 12, enables local authorities to regulate "sexually oriented" shows to protect public health, safety, and welfare.
The legislation prohibits children from being near these performances. The appeals court overturned a lower court’s decision that had blocked the law.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton called the ruling a "victory" for child protection against "erotic" drag shows. He stated, “I will always work to shield our children from exposure to erotic and inappropriate sexually oriented performances. It is an honor to have defended this law, ensuring that our state remains safe for families and children, and I look forward to continuing to vigorously defend it on remand before the district court.”
Several drag and LGBTQIA+ organizations filed a lawsuit against Paxton, arguing that the law is excessively broad, vague, and infringes upon First Amendment rights. They claim the legislation unfairly targets drag shows as a disfavored form of expression.
The groups’ complaint reads that the law “unconstitutionally singles out drag performances as a disfavored form of expression.”
Author's summary: The appeals court's decision allows Texas to enforce a law restricting drag shows deemed sexually explicit, sparking ongoing debate over free speech and child protection.