The Dismissal Deniers
Next Tuesday marks the 50th anniversary of the day when governor-general Sir John Kerr legitimately used a constitutional power to resolve a severe political deadlock and secure the Crown's rightful funds necessary for government operations. Despite this, Sir John Kerr has faced relentless criticism, even after his death.
It is important to clarify that Sir John Kerr did not remove a grossly incompetent government—that was the will of the Australian people. Kerr merely provided the opportunity for that change, which was a consequence rather than the motive of his decision.
The anniversary has sparked a significant backlash. This includes a new biography of Whitlam, a documentary by Sky News Australia, and a full-day event hosted by the Museum of Australian Democracy and streamed live from Old Parliament House.
Anniversary Event and Participants
The event, chaired by Barrie Cassidy, features journalists Paul Kelly and Troy Bramston, along with academic Professor Jenny Hocking, all known critics of Kerr. Most participants have affiliations with the Labor Party, setting the tone for a highly partisan commemoration.
"So, you can imagine the sound and fury that will engulf the parliamentary triangle on this otherwise sacred day."
Such preparations suggest a sharp, emotionally charged response rather than a balanced reflection on Kerr’s controversial but constitutionally supported action.
Author's summary: The 50th anniversary of Sir John Kerr’s dismissal of the Whitlam government reignites fierce partisan debate, showing Kerr as a figure still deeply divisive in Australian political history.